atmovie.gif

This is an introduction to the part on Visualization of Atomic Collisions Calculations.

NEXT PICTURE .... LAST PICTURE and Links further

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

...... (bohrtask.gif)

.. BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

We have chosen this quatation as a motto for this work

..

..

..

..

..

persp.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

This is a picture describing the basis of the (semi) classical collision theory. On the next picture, the plane is rotated into the screen plane.

..

..

..

..

..

plane.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

The collision plane, seen on the previous perspective drawing, rotated into the screen plane

..

..

..

..

..

tdsep1.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

The theory: Time dependent Schroedinger equation relevant for the collision process. The expansion in a basis set is shown. Also shown are the kinetic energy of the electron and the two potentials, describing the interaction with the target and the projectile.

..

..

..

..

..

expand.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

Using the expansion and evaluating projections on the basis states, one obtains a set of coupled equations for the coefficients as functions of time.

..

..

..

..

..

eq1.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

In most cases, one is satisfied by obtaining the expansion coefficients, since the occupation probabilities (and the experimentally relevant quantities) can be obtained from them. However, there is also the concept of probability density and probability density current. These two quantities are defined above.

To obtain them, we must use the basis states in "all points", i.e. on a certain mesh. This is an additional computational effort, which cannot lead to any comparison with experiment.

It can, however, provide cllues for understanding of the mechanisms.

..

..

..

..

..

plane.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

..

..

..

..

..

..

dens.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

This is a plot of probability density. Each new pattern is factor 2 down, i.e. exponential scale with steps of log 2.

..

..

..

..

..

curr.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

This is the corresponding probability density current.

..

..

..

..

..

denscur.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

Here the two previous are compared.

..

..

..

..

..

eq1.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

Once more the definitions......

..

..

..

..

..

3pp3pm.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

This is a cut from a movie, which one can run in task 5. This particular picture compares two densities toowards the "end" of the collision. The difference is in the starting condition: The upper starts in "3p-" state, the lower in "3p+ state. See on the next picture what does it mean in terms of currents.

..

..

..

..

..

strom1.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

These are the coresponding currents "before" the collision. The picture tells more than words and formulae.

..

..

..

..

..

3pp3pm2.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

Now that collision is "finished". Can you describe the difference? Can it be understood (or made probable) using classical arguments?

..

..

..

..

..

alig.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

Another starting point: the states are prepared in alligned states. What will be the difference now?

..

..

..

..

..

1s2s.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

Here and in the following are pictures of densities (and at the end 1 current), constructed from simple amplitudes, equal to 1. These plots show the hydrogenic state densities.

..

..

..

..

..

2pand2p.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

Here and in the following are pictures of densities (and at the end 1 current), constructed from simple amplitudes, equal to 1. These plots show the hydrogenic state densities.

..

..

..

..

..

1dens.gif

BACK .... TOP .... NEXT

..

..

..

..

..

..

1curr.gif

BACK .... TOP .... Links Out .....

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

..

Instructions .....

About The Movies .....

General Descriptions of the course

Top of this document

Index

..

..

..

..

..

..